Tuesday, 16 April 2019 16:05

The expensive contest that never was

Although she waged a spirited campaign, Dr. Pelonomi Venson- Moitoi’s presidential bid was littered with many faultlines that culminated in her last minute pullout to the dismay of multitudes of BDP faithful.

The nation’s hope and anticipation had built over time on who would win the historic presidential race. The campaign was tough and at one point involved legal action in which three judges recused themselves to avoid any semblance of bias or perceived relationship with any of the parties.

What gave rise to the court case is the fact that Moitoi had submitted a list of people that she said were delegates to Secretary General, Mpho Balopi in compliance with Article 29.3 of the BDP constitution. Balopi received Moitoi‘s letter accompanied with names of her 50 delegates but he noticed that 26 of them were Councillors and therefore not  delegates. 

Balopi told Botswana Guardian that he wrote to Moitoi that, “according to our reading of Article 26.4 of the constitution and also the legal opinion that the party had sought from the party lawyers, Councillors are not party delegates and therefore  once those people are removed from the list, it means she does not comply”.  Moitoi was then advised to comply, and to do her due diligence to ensure that people that she is submitting are delegates.

APPLICATION
Balopi said after receipt of that letter, an urgent application, “we were served on Wednesday afternoon and required to be in court at 8; 30 am the next morning.  “The application was bulky, which led to the attorneys working the entire night to respond and actually had to call me as I was just leaving for Kang to come back so that I could give them an affidavit.”

LEGAL OPINION
Three weeks prior to the party writing to Moitoi, the party had obtained legal opinion that the only delegates template by Article 29.3 and 29.3.1 are delegates as defined by article 26.4.2 of the BDP constitution.   The attendees of the national congress are all members of the national council (Article 27.3) and they are: Members of the Central Committee, MPs of the party, all regional chairpersons, all branch chairpersons and their secretaries, all members of the inner executive committee of the Youth, Women’s wing executive, one councillor from each branch, while members of the sub committees of the central committees may attend as observers.

The second group of attendees is eight (8) delegates from each branch of the 57 constituencies bringing the total to 456 delegates as well as all Councillors. All the above have voting rights. Each constituency has to bring observers.
It was on the strength of the legal opinion that Moitoi was advised in her list that at least 26 were not delegates in accordance with the BDP constitution.

LAWSUIT
The Party lawyers raised a number of points in limine and argued them in court, which acceeded to three points being; that, the matter was not urgent as Moitoi had known as far back as 17th December 2018 that she was going to contest. She has been a Central Committee member for long, she knew the process and it ought not to have taken her by surprise that the rules were the ones that are in place.  She argued that the constitution does not provide rules, and in court it was demonstrated that there were rules.

The post of a party president is that of a member of the Central Committee in accordance with Article 28, and the constitution provides  for elections of central committee members with the  difference being while the elections for CC are done every two years, the election for president is held on elections year only. The second point Moitoi had not demonstrated that she had locus standi in court showing that she has a demonstrable right to be before the court.

The confusion arose from the fact that BDP constitution states that for one to qualify as a candidate for the post of the presidency for the party, one must also qualify to be president of Botswana under Article 29.3.3 of the constitution.  The constitution states for one to be president of Botswana one must be a citizen by birth or descent. In her founding affidavit she did not state whether she is a citizen by birth or descent instead she only stated that she is a Member of Parliament. The judges ruled that Section 33(1) of the Botswana Constitution state that a person shall qualify to be a president of Botswana if he/she is a citizen of Botswana by birth or descent.

Although there were arguments on the definition of delegate, the court did not rule on it because it was raised as one of the points in limine. Before the court process Moitoi’s lawyers had indicated that they would like to explore the possibility whether the matter could be resolved amicably and they requested to meet with President Masisi. Balopi gave the go ahead and the president was willing to meet them. When the case was set to resume at 2pm the meeting had been set for 11.30. The president and his team waited for about an hour.  The president extended an olive branch that although Moitoi’s 26 Councillors are not delegates, for the purpose of the selection the party can accept them as delegates. 

Moitoi demanded to be given a voters’ roll but Masisi told her that he also does not have it, however, Balopi can provide it so that she has time to inspect it before the election.  Moitoi’s other concerns included wanting to know who the election commissioners were and to be assured of the fairness and transparency of the elections.  She was assured there will be international observers, voting will be done in the presence of observers, media and diplomatic corps.

There would also be verification before and after reconciliation.Moitoi requested for congress to be postponed to July. The party told her that is not possible as people are already in Kang. Further there are rules that she could have followed if she wanted the congress postponed.   In Kang the Commissioners called for the names of both Masisi and Venson, but the latter did not confirm her candidacy as she had withdrawn.

Published in News

Botswana Police has generated over P5 million in road offenders charges since they mounted a road block at Gamodubu on the Gaborone-Molepolole road since 2016, Parliament has been told.

Gamodubu road block is one of the most effective as motorists cannot avoid it. The offences range from driving a vehicle which is not roadworthy, drunk driving, unlicensed drivers, pirating and over loading to mention, but a few.Answering a question in parliament, Acting minister of Defence, Justice and Security, Dr Pelonomi Venson- Moitoi said since it was mounted in July 2016 the road block at Gamodubu has generated P5 619 550. Moitoi was answering a question from Member of Parliament for Molepolole South, Dr Tlamelo Mmatli.

Dr Mmatli had asked how much revenue the permanent roadblock at Gamodubu has generated since its mounting. In a supplemetary question MP for Selibe Phikwe West, Dithapelo Keorapetse asked if it was true that the Commissioner of Police has issued an instruction to all police stations around the country to use all available avenues to collect traffic fines including forcing drivers to pay. Venson- Moitoi could not confirm nor deny, but said she would not consider it abnormal that a manager would set targets or insist that the law be applied.

“If the police are put on the road to apply the law and deal with offenders of traffic laws, I am sure that he would insist that all offences be dealt with and the necessary charges and fines collected. There would be nothing abnormal about that.” MP for Gaborone North  Haskins Nkaigwa asked how true it is that the money collected from traffic fines is not deposited directly into the Consolidated  Fund, but instead goes to the Commissioner’s office and they in turn use such funds to address the police needs. Venson- Moitoi said she would have to get the MP that information, “but my first understanding is that first the police collect it. How much of that goes to the Consolidated Fund, I would have to get you that information.”

Published in News
Friday, 21 December 2018 12:46

How government kills private media

For every P3 million or more that the Ministry for Presidential Affairs, Governance and Public Administration spends per annum in advertising in the Daily News - government gave a paltry P8, 092.06 to each private house.

In fact to say government spent P8, 092.06 in advertising in private media is an exaggeration as not all private media houses benefitted the same for the 2018/19 financial year. Acting Minister of Presidential Affairs, Governance and Public Administration, Dr Pelonomi Venson- Moitoi told Parliament before it went on a Christmas break that the ministry does not have a specific budget to sustain jobs created in the private print media.

However, the advertising and publicity budget in the ministry has been allocated to amongst other things, pay for advertising by the ministry in any media house. She said that for the 2018/2019 financial year a total of P5,469, 920 was credited to the ministry for advertising and publicity purposes.

For the past 12 months from December 1 2017 to November 31 2018, the ministry spent a total P3,209, 556 - 80 for advertising in the print media. From this amount P3,112, 452 were spent on the Daily News, whilst P97,104.80 was spent on the private media.  Moitoi was answering a question asked by Specially elected Member of Parliament Reatile Mephato who had asked the minister to state the annual budget under her ministry to support different print media houses, through advertising to help them sustain jobs they have created, if any, and to provide a monthly breakdown of expenditure towards each print media house for the past 12 months.

In a supplementary question Member of Parliament for Gaborone Central, Dr Phenyo Butale asked what, historically, has been the ratio of the amount that the ministry spends on private print media vis-à-vis on Daily News in terms of the advertising budget.

“I want to put it to you that there has been a drastic drop, which drastic drop is linked to your attempt to kill the print media, which you know very well is dependent on government for adverting and survival,” said Dr Butale.Moitoi said she believes the MP has the information as he said he knows “more than I do. I do not have the proportions and ratios that he is talking about. If he wants me to give them to him, I would have to go back to the office and the substantive ministry.”

Another supplementary question came from Member of Parliament for Kanye South Abram Kesupile. “I ask, given the fact that government has a moral responsibility to see to it that the print media succeeds, would you be amenable to a suggestion that you invert the numbers that you have just given to us, the P3 million to the private print media, the P97 000 to the Daily News?

Moitoi answered that, “We are talking about responsibilities here. If I may hazard an answer, everybody has a responsibility, if we are talking about media and government; the latter does have a responsibility to help the media grow.  “The media does have a responsibility to educate, inform and entertain. Now the questions we can ask and spend the whole afternoon debating is whether we are all doing our responsibilities and carrying them out to the satisfaction of all the parties and I suppose that is a debate maybe we should engage in,” she said.

Published in News

BG Calendar

« June 2019 »
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30